Names hold profound significance, carrying stories, identities, and destinies. For many, understanding the meaning behind a name is a deeply personal quest. You might be wondering, “What Does The Name Alex Mean In The Bible?” While “Alex” as a standalone name isn’t directly found in scripture, it’s often a shortened, contemporary form of “Alexander,” a Greek name meaning “defender of mankind.” Delving deeper into the Bible reveals a rich tapestry of name meanings and the powerful concept of renaming, especially within the context of temple rituals and divine encounters. This exploration, drawing from insightful biblical scholarship, will take us beyond a simple definition of a single name, and into the heart of how names and renaming functioned in the ancient biblical world, and how these concepts resonate with broader spiritual themes of identity and transformation.
Understanding the Ancient Temple and Its Symbolism
To grasp the significance of names and renaming in the Bible, it’s crucial to first understand the role of the ancient temple. The temple in ancient Israel was more than just a place of worship; it was considered a sacred space, a symbolic representation of the cosmos, and a earthly dwelling place for the divine presence. Our understanding of these ancient temples is built from various sources, including detailed descriptions within the Pentateuch, indirect biblical evidence like Psalms, accounts in historical books such as Samuel and Ezekiel, later pseudepigraphic writings, and even rabbinic evidence like the Mishnah. While each source requires careful interpretation, together they paint a rich picture of temple practices and beliefs.
Scholars recognize that the biblical descriptions of the temple, particularly the early ones, often omit details about rituals and practices. To reconstruct a fuller picture, they turn to indirect biblical clues, such as psalms likely used in temple rituals, and narratives from books like Samuel and Ezekiel that depict temple events. Writings from the centuries around Christ, along with later rabbinic texts, also offer valuable perspectives, though these must be approached cautiously due to their later composition and potential biases. Even allusions within the Bible itself present challenges, as over-interpretation can lead to the discovery of rituals that may never have existed. However, when used thoughtfully, these sources help illuminate ancient attitudes toward the temple and shed light on aspects of worship that might be obscure in the primary biblical text. Keeping these limitations in mind, we can explore potential evidence for ritual renaming within this sacred context.
Allusions to Ritual Renaming in the Old Testament
While the Bible doesn’t explicitly detail a ritual of renaming within the temple, certain passages allude to the idea of receiving a new name in connection with divine favor and sacred spaces. One suggestive reference appears in Isaiah 56:5. Here, the Lord speaks of foreigners and eunuchs – groups often excluded from temple service – and declares that in the future, “unto them will I give in mine house and within my walls a place and a name better than of sons and of daughters: I will give them an everlasting name, that shall not be cut off.” Isaiah’s poetic style often allows for multiple interpretations, yet the imagery is striking. The promise of an “everlasting name” is explicitly linked to the temple, suggesting a profound connection between divine recognition, the sacred space, and the bestowal of a new identity.
Further emphasizing this theme, Isaiah 62:2 speaks of Jerusalem’s restoration after the Babylonian captivity. The city, once humiliated and called “Forsaken” and “Desolate,” is promised a dramatic transformation: “thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name.” This new name, embodying hope and restoration, signifies a complete reversal of fortune. The ancient world understood the power of names, and as scholar John McKenzie notes, a new life situation often “demanded a new name in order that it be recognized as new.” This concept of renaming as a marker of transformation and divine favor resonates throughout Isaiah. Later, in Isaiah 65:15, the prophet again speaks of a future separation where the Lord will destroy the wicked but “call his servants by another name.”
Numbers 6:27 offers another intriguing perspective. In instructing priests on how to bless the Israelites, the Lord states, “And they shall put my name upon the children of Israel.” While this refers to bestowing the Lord’s name upon the community rather than individual renaming, the underlying concept of a name being conferred upon worshippers by priestly authority is present. This act, linked to the priests and the divine blessing, echoes the idea of a sacred naming within a ritual context. From a Latter-day Saint perspective, this passage evokes parallels to King Benjamin in the Book of Mormon, who gathered his people at the temple to have them take upon themselves the name of Christ (Mosiah 5:6–11).
It’s important to acknowledge that these biblical verses are allusions, not explicit descriptions of a ritual renaming ordinance as understood in modern contexts. They speak of names conferred upon communities or in metaphorical senses, and the precise nature of these “names” and their conferral remains unclear. While we may not literally call Jerusalem “My Delight is in Her” today, these passages reveal that the imagery of the Lord granting new names within the temple was a powerful and resonant concept in ancient Israel. They suggest a cultural and religious understanding where names were not merely labels, but carried deep significance, especially in the context of divine encounters and sacred spaces. To further explore the potential for ritual renaming, we turn to a powerful symbolic connection: the temple as the Garden of Eden.
The Temple as the Garden of Eden: A Paradise Recreated
One of the most insightful approaches to understanding the ancient temple and its rituals is to view it through the lens of the Garden of Eden narrative. The temple was not simply a building; it was intentionally designed and understood as a microcosm, a symbolic representation of the cosmos, and specifically, a recreation of the paradise of Eden. This connection is evident in various aspects of the temple’s construction and symbolism.
The interior of the temple, constructed primarily of cedar, was adorned with carvings that evoked the lushness of a garden. 1 Kings 6:29 describes Solomon decorating the walls with “carved figures of cherubims and palm trees and open flowers, within and without.” Palm trees and flowers immediately conjure images of a garden, but the presence of cherubim makes the Edenic connection unmistakable. Outside of the temple and descriptions of God’s throne, cherubim are primarily associated with the Garden of Eden, placed there to guard the way to the tree of life after humanity’s expulsion.
Even the furnishings and objects within the temple echoed garden imagery. The two pillars at the entrance to the inner court were adorned with lilies and pomegranate decorations, resembling large, fruitful trees (1 Kings 7:19–20). The golden menorah, a central fixture in the sanctuary, was also designed as a tree, with “branches,” “flowers,” and “bowls made like unto almonds” (Exodus 25:31–33). Ten such lampstands lined the inner sanctuary (1 Kings 7:49), creating an impression akin to walking into a sacred, illuminated forest.
Ancient Israelites were clearly aware of this garden symbolism within the temple. Legends recount the prophet Zechariah’s vision of a man “standing among the trees of the tabernacle,” an image likely inspired by the pillars and lampstands. Psalm 92:12-13 further reinforces this imagery, stating that the righteous are “like the palm tree… planted in the house of the Lord.” Animal depictions, such as washbasins adorned with “lions, oxen, and cherubims” (1 Kings 7:29) and the bronze laver resting on twelve oxen and decorated with “flowers of lilies” (1 Kings 7:25–26), further contributed to the garden-like atmosphere.
The temple was not just any garden; it was specifically designed to represent Eden. Many key figures and elements from the Eden story find their symbolic counterparts in the temple. As mentioned, cherubim guarded the entrance to Eden and also the Holy of Holies in the temple (1 Kings 6:23–28). The priest in the temple can be seen as representing Adam in his role in Eden (a connection we will explore further). Even the serpent, a figure from the Eden narrative, made an appearance within Israelite worship, albeit controversially, as indicated by the account of the bronze serpent in 2 Kings 18:4.
The very construction narratives of the tabernacle and Solomon’s Temple further reinforce the link to creation and Eden. The tabernacle’s creation, as described in Exodus, echoes the Genesis creation account with verbal parallels and thematic resonances. Both narratives begin with the “spirit of God,” mention “seeing the work,” and conclude with blessings after “completing the work.” The seven-day structure of creation is mirrored in the tabernacle narrative, with Moses entering God’s presence on the seventh day and receiving seven sets of instructions. Solomon’s Temple construction also follows a pattern of sevens, being built over seven years and dedicated during a seven-day festival in the seventh month. These intricate connections demonstrate a deliberate effort to link the temple thematically and symbolically to the creation story in Genesis 1-3.
Beyond decorations and narrative parallels, the temple’s location and features also reinforced its Edenic identity. The temple was frequently described as being situated on a mountain – “mount Zion,” “the mountain of the Lord’s house,” or “the mountain of [the Lord’s] inheritance.” Mountains in ancient cultures were often seen as sacred centers, connecting heaven, earth, and the underworld, facilitating communication between the divine and human realms. Ezekiel’s description of Eden itself places it “upon the holy mountain of God” (Ezekiel 28:13–14), mirroring the temple’s mountain setting. Eden, like the temple, was envisioned as a sacred mountain, a place where the divine presence dwelled.
Furthermore, both Eden and the temple are depicted as sources of life-giving waters flowing outwards. Eden’s river divided into four heads, watering the garden and the surrounding lands. Similarly, the temple was associated with the Gihon spring, sharing the name of one of Eden’s rivers (1 Kings 1:43–46). Prophetic visions of the restored millennial temple also depict a river flowing from its base, bringing life and fertility to the earth (Ezekiel 47:1–12; Zechariah 14:3–8; Joel 3:16–18). These shared features – garden imagery, cherubim, mountain setting, and life-giving waters – solidify the temple’s identity as a symbolic and functional recreation of the Garden of Eden. Understanding this profound connection allows us to delve deeper into the potential rituals and symbolic meanings within the temple, particularly concerning the role of names and renaming.
Adam as Priest: Bridging Eden and the Temple
The symbolic link between the temple and Eden extends to the roles of individuals within these sacred spaces. Just as the temple mirrored Eden, the priests who served in the temple could be seen as representing Adam, the first man, in his role within the Garden. This connection is evident in their shared roles as mediators, their symbolic clothing, and the tasks they performed.
Priests in the temple acted as mediators between God and humanity in two directions. They represented the people before God, interceding on their behalf in offerings, prayers, and times of crisis. Conversely, they also represented God before the people, delivering divine messages and judgments. Deuteronomy 19:17 and 1 Samuel 1:17 illustrate this, showing priests standing in the Lord’s place to deliver pronouncements.
Adam, in the Garden of Eden, similarly embodies a dual representative role. His very name, ʾādām in Hebrew, meaning “man,” signifies his representation of humanity as a whole. His story, from innocence to transgression, is seen as a reflection of the human condition. Yet, Adam is also depicted as God’s representative. Created in God’s image and likeness, he is tasked with having “dominion… over all the earth” (Genesis 1:26), echoing divine sovereignty. In the ancient Near Eastern context, placing an image of a king in distant lands signified their sovereign presence; similarly, Adam, as God’s image, represented Yahweh’s rule over the earth.
Intriguingly, ancient sources outside of Genesis depict Adam in priestly garments. Ezekiel 28:13, in a prophecy against the king of Tyre, compares the king to an Adam-like figure in Eden, stating, “Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering…” The list of precious stones remarkably aligns with the stones on the high priest’s breastplate (Exodus 28:17–20), suggesting a priestly association for Adam’s attire in Eden. Rabbinic tradition, as found in Genesis Rabbah, describes Adam clothed in “garments of light” radiating like a torch, reminiscent of the holiness attributed to priestly clothing. Biblical authors also describe priests as “clothed with salvation” (2 Chronicles 6:41) and “clothed with righteousness” (Psalm 132:9), further strengthening the connection between Adam’s garments and priestly vestments.
Even the language describing Adam’s work in Eden mirrors the language used for priestly service in the temple. Priests are charged with “guarding” (šmr) the sanctuary and “keeping” (ʿbd) its service (Numbers 3:7). Genesis 2:15 states that Adam was placed in Eden “to dress it and to keep it,” using the same Hebrew roots, šmr and ʿbd. This unique pairing of these verbs, almost exclusively used in relation to Adam and priests in their respective sanctuaries, strongly suggests a deliberate parallel between Adam’s role in Eden and the priests’ role in the temple.
Extrabiblical traditions further solidify this Adam-priest connection. The Life of Adam and Eve depicts Adam collecting incense to offer as a sacrifice, a priestly duty. The Book of Moses also portrays Adam performing sacrifices (Moses 5:5–6). Rabbinic tradition even claims Adam’s creation dust was taken from the future temple site. The Life of Adam and Eve states that Solomon built the temple on the very spot where Adam used to pray.
These converging lines of evidence, both within and outside the Bible, present Eden as a proto-temple and Adam as a proto-priest. The temple was not merely like Eden; in the ancient mind, it was Eden, preserved and made accessible. The Jerusalem temple served as a “survival of the primal paradise lost to the profane world… preserving Eden and providing a taste of the life of intimacy with God.” This profound understanding of the temple as Eden and the priest as Adam provides a crucial context for understanding the significance of naming and renaming within this sacred space.
Naming in the Creation Accounts: Divine Authority and Identity
Names play a pivotal role in both the creation narrative of Genesis 1 and the Garden of Eden story in Genesis 2-3. In Genesis 1, God’s creative acts are concisely described, and within this minimalist account, the act of naming stands out. God “names” (qrʾ) his creations a total of five times – light, firmament, dry land, seas, and night. This repeated naming is not a trivial detail; it underscores the profound significance of names in the ancient worldview.
As scholars Porter and Ricks explain, “In the cultures of the ancient Near East, existence was thought to be dependent upon an identifying word, that word being a ‘name.’ The name of someone (or something) was perceived not as a mere abstraction, but as a real entity, ‘the audible and spoken image of the person . . . his spiritual essence.’” Names were not mere labels but were considered intrinsic to existence and identity. The Babylonian creation myth Enuma Elish echoes this, describing a pre-creation state where “skies above were not yet named / Nor earth below pronounced by name… When yet no gods were manifest, / Nor names pronounced, nor destinies decreed.” This highlights the act of naming as a fundamental aspect of creation and bringing order to the cosmos.
In Genesis 2, Adam participates in this divine act of naming by naming the animals. His responsibilities in Eden mirror God’s creative work: to “dress and keep” the garden (like priestly service) and to name the animals. This act of naming is presented as a divine delegation, with God bringing the animals to Adam “to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof” (Genesis 2:19). Adam, created in God’s image, performs imitatio dei, imitating God’s creative act of naming.
Three scenes in the Eden narrative are particularly relevant to understanding potential temple naming practices. First, the presentation of animals before Adam by God “to see what he would call them” mirrors the concept of presentation before divine authority in temple worship. The Israelites were commanded to “come to appear before the Lord… in the place which he shall choose [the temple]” (Deuteronomy 31:10–11). The animals being presented to Adam at the culmination of the seven-day creation echoes this temple-related concept of appearing before the Lord, or his representative.
The second scene is the creation of woman. Just as the animals were brought to Adam, “the Lord God… brought her unto the man” (Genesis 2:22). In a temple context, this can be interpreted as the woman being presented before the priest, representing Adam in his priestly role. When Adam names her “Woman” (ʾiššā), it’s not just a label but a declaration of her essence and origin: “she shall be called Woman (ʾiššā), because she was taken out of Man (ʾîš).” This naming is deeply meaningful, connecting her identity to her creation and relationship with man.
The third scene is the renaming of woman after the Fall. Following their expulsion from Eden and the pronouncement of curses, Adam renames her “Eve” (ḥawwā): “And Adam called his wife’s name Eve (ḥawwā); because she was the mother of all living (ḥāy)” (Genesis 3:20). This renaming marks a new chapter in her life, tied to motherhood and the continuation of life outside of Eden. Both namings of the woman by Adam highlight the power of naming to define identity and destiny, particularly in moments of significant life change and divine interaction.
Implications for Temple Rituals: Re-entering Eden and Receiving a New Name?
The rich symbolism connecting the temple to the Garden of Eden, and Adam to the priesthood, along with the emphasis on naming in the creation accounts, opens intriguing possibilities for understanding temple rituals. While the Bible doesn’t explicitly describe a ritual of individual renaming, the Genesis narrative, interpreted through a temple lens, suggests a potential framework for such a practice.
The temple, as a recreated Eden, offered worshippers a symbolic return to paradise. The garden imagery, cherubim, and sacred setting all contributed to this experience. Within this context, the allusions to renaming in Isaiah and Numbers become more resonant. The Lord commanding priests to “put my name upon the children of Israel” (Numbers 6:27) could be seen as a temple-related act, mirroring Adam’s naming of animals and Eve. Perhaps worshippers, entering the symbolic Eden of the temple, could symbolically receive or take upon themselves the divine name, mirroring Adam’s role in naming within Eden and signifying a renewed or transformed identity in God’s presence.
Isaiah’s prophecies about receiving “a place and… an everlasting name” in the temple (Isaiah 56:5) and being “called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name” (Isaiah 62:2) could then be interpreted as allusions to such a temple ritual, whether or not a formalized “ritual renaming” as Latter-day Saints understand it existed precisely in that form. The imagery of receiving a new name in God’s house aligns with the broader themes of transformation, divine favor, and renewed identity within the temple context.
It is crucial to reiterate that reconstructing ancient temple practices is inherently challenging due to the limitations of available sources. The evidence presented remains suggestive and circumstantial. The Bible is a complex text, and interpretations can vary. However, by acknowledging these limitations and approaching the evidence thoughtfully, we can explore possibilities and gain richer insights into the symbolic world of the ancient temple.
The combined evidence from Genesis 1-3, alongside the allusions to renaming in other Old Testament passages, does leave open the possibility that some form of ritual naming may have taken place in the ancient temple. Such a ritual would align well with what we know about the temple’s symbolic function as Eden, the priest’s role as Adam’s representative, and the profound significance of names in the ancient world. Names were believed to embody a person’s essence and destiny. If a temple-related renaming practice existed, it would be fitting for it to be conducted by God’s representatives, the priests, within his sacred house, offering worshippers a chance to symbolically re-enter Eden and receive a new identity in divine relationship. While we may not definitively answer “what does the name Alex mean in the bible” in a direct, literal sense, exploring the broader biblical context of names and renaming reveals a deeper appreciation for the power of names to shape identity and connect us to the divine narrative.
References
[1] Jackson, Kent P., comp. Joseph Smith’s Commentary on the Bible. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1994.
[2] Ludlow, Victor. “John: The Once and Future Witness.” Ensign, December 1991.
[3] Mowinckel, Sigmund. The Psalms in Israel’s Worship. Dearborn, MI: Dove, 2004.
[4] McKenzie, John L. Second Isaiah. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1968.
[5] Christensen, Kevin. “The Temple, the Monarchy, and Wisdom: Lehi’s World and the Scholarship of Margaret Barker.” In Glimpses of Lehi’s Jerusalem, edited by John W. Welch, David Rolph Seely, and Jo Ann H. Seely. Provo, UT: FARMS, 2004.
[6] Levenson, Jon D. “The Temple and the World.” Journal of Religion 64, no. 3 (July 1984).
[7] Levenson, Jon D. Sinai and Zion: An Entry into the Jewish Bible. New York: HarperCollins, 1985.
[8] Beale, G. K. The Temple and the Church’s Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of God. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
[9] Robinson, S., trans. “Testament of Adam.” In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by James Charlesworth. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.
[10] Handy, Lowell K. “Serpent, Bronze.” In The Anchor Bible Dictionary, edited by David Noel Freedman. New York: Doubleday, 1992.
[11] Fishbane, Michael A. Biblical Text and Texture: A Literary Reading of Selected Texts. Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 1998.
[12] Anderson, Gary A. “Biblical Origins and the Problem of the Fall.” Pro Ecclesia 10, no. 1 (Winter 2001).
[13] Clifford, Richard. The Cosmic Mountain in Canaan and the Old Testament. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1972.
[14] Jacobsen, Thorkild, trans. “The Cylinders of Gudea.” In The Harps That Once . . . Sumerian Poetry in Translation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.
[15] Freedman, H., and Maurice Simon, eds. Midrash Rabbah. New York: Soncino, 1983.
[16] Kee, H., trans. “Testament of Levi.” In Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by James Charlesworth. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.
[17] Johnson, M. D., trans. “Life of Adam and Eve.” Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by James Charlesworth. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.
[18] Levenson, Jon, and Kevin Madigan. Resurrection: The Power of God for Christians and Jews. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.
[19] Porter, Bruce H., and Stephen D. Ricks. “Names in Antiquity: Old, New, and Hidden.” In By Study and Also by Faith, edited by John M. Lundquist and Stephen D. Ricks. Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1990.
[20] Dalley, Stephanie, ed. and trans. Myths from Mesopotamia: Creation, The Flood, Gilgamesh, and Others. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
